Thatcher

From Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and George W. Bush learned to trust their gut.

The Iron Lady’s Mad Shadow

Margaret Thatcher’s gut instincts influenced the next generation of politicians, from Blair to Bush.

BY Jane Miller

While the film settles for comedy rather than excoriation, the discomfort one feels watching Thatcher going mad is mitigated by the suggested possibility that she was never entirely sane.

Meryl Streep impersonates Margaret Thatcher wonderfully in The Iron Lady . (For so doing she received her 17th Oscar nomination.) A good deal of the film has Thatcher in her dressing-gown, mildly demented and remembering or misremembering her middle years, when, from 1979 to 1990, she was prime minister of Britain, the only woman to hold that job, which she occupied for longer than anyone else in the 20th century. She was much liked and much disliked, and she still is. While the film settles for comedy rather than excoriation, the discomfort one feels watching Thatcher going mad is mitigated by the suggested possibility that she was never entirely sane. Her “I will not go mad” echoes King Lear – and calls into question her right to imagine herself in such grandly tragic company.

Alexandra Roach plays the young Thatcher, who adores her father, despises her mother and marries a kindly duffer she comes to rely on. By the time she is leading the Tory Party, she and Meryl Streep are one. Laughed at by her almost solidly male and snobbish party colleagues as the shrill daughter of a provincial grocer, she becomes their leader, providing them with exactly the homilies her father offered her; and the scenes in which these gray-suited men do her bidding like boys hoping to please Nanny, and not altogether averse to her smacks, are among the film’s funniest.

The “Thatcher Years,” as they are sometimes called, are not by and large remembered warmly, nor were they funny. Ian Gilmour, a patrician Tory whom Thatcher sacked from her first government in 1981, wrote of the “devastation” caused by her fervent adoption of Friedmanite monetarist policies. His book Dancing With Dogma records some achievements, but reminds us that child poverty doubled during those years, that the tax burden was shifted from the rich to the poor (where it has remained), and that “British society became coarser and more selfish. Attitudes were encouraged which would even have undermined the well-being of a much more prosperous society.” If that is the verdict of a high Tory, imagine the feelings she inspired in many of the rest of us.

Thatcher pronounced herself from the beginning a “conviction” politician who had absolutely no time for consensus, and this was Gilmour’s principal objection to her. Agreement, he wrote, “effectively meant a one-woman consensus, a state of affairs which rendered debate superfluous.” Tony Blair, the Labour prime minister from 1997 to 2007, never hid his admiration for her. From her he learned the language that denies debate: “I passionately believe that…,” “I only know what I believe,” and “It is the right thing to do” have come to be offered as a rationale or clinching argument. The 33 years since her rise to power have seen a damaging diminution of parliamentary and cabinet debate in Britain.

Some surprisingly claim Thatcher as a proto-feminist, an inspiration to later generations of young women for whom the sky’s the limit. One Sunday paper recently suggested that there is currently a clutch of right-wing feminists in parliament, which I hope is a contradiction in terms. And there has certainly been a move among some women who describe themselves as feminist to insist that there is no inconsistency in women pursuing their ambitions just as she did, while concerning themselves not at all with other women or, indeed, with whether particular policies affect women for good or ill. Femininity is seen in the film simply as an unavoidable fate, which can at times be turned to a woman’s advantage, and that was probably Thatcher’s view of the matter. Her promise to herself that she at least would never waste time washing teacups, as her mother had done – “one’s life must matter” – is echoed in the last scene of the film, in which that is exactly what she is doing. The woman who believed that “there is no such thing as society” ends her film life alone and outside the world she influenced so disastrously, against a soundtrack that mingles the ghostly cheers of the multitude with her own equally ghostly sighs.

Jane Miller first worked in publishing, then as an English teacher and finally at the London University Institute of Education. She retired as Professor Emeritus in 1998.

More information about Jane Miller

  • Reader Comments

    Always had a gut feeling Thatcher was wrong, Reagan was wrong,
    “w” was wrong, Blair was wrong, Repugnicans are wrong,

    Posted by Larry Polsky on Feb 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM

    Streep is utterly unconvincing as Thatcher. She fails to capture the unalloyed fanaticism of this woman. The most striking thing about Thatcher, and the thing that prompted me to question her sanity, was that “dead-rabbit” look she had in her eyes. I am gratified that Jane ZMiller also had doubts about her sanity. Streep is much too pretty and too soft. I’m not an admirer of Streep’s. I always believed that if you are conscious that you are looking at an actor acting, then by argument you are looking at a poor actor. I have never been able to take Streep seriously in any part. That said, I doubt if anyone could have captured Thatcher’s appearance and manner. I remember when she came to power. The ‘working-class Tories’ were celebrating. I told them that this was no MacMillan or Douglas-Hume. This one was different. This one really wanted to hurt. That year the whole atmosphere in England changed. There was a ‘what have we done?” air. People were palpably scared. Thatcher did nothing for British industry. She merely reversed the redistribution of wealth that had occurred since WW2. She was part of the right-wing backlash, or counter-revolution, with Reagan, Kohl and Mulroney, that has dominated the Western world ever since. She was simple, narrow, dogmatic, a bully, more lacking in compassion than the average Tory, and no friend to democracy or human rights, and certainly not of working people. Her worship and defense of Pinochet demonstrated that. Her endorsement of the simple cliches of monetarism and market rule was as much complexity as she could handle. People have misidentified her simplicity as single-minded determination.  I hate Thatcher because she was cruel, caused a great deal of suffering, was arrogant, used her voice like a megaphone, and raised class-consciousness in me to new heights. I will happily dance on her grave. She is the only human being I have ever hated. May she rot in hell.

    Posted by Colin Smith on Feb 25, 2012 at 7:56 AM

    I don’t need to watch any movies about this vile person. I lived through the deluded, self serving, reign of this witch. Do not believe this orchestrated, charm offensive who’s sole aim is to whitewash the truth. Thatcher ruined my country for purely political reasons. She destroyed manufacturing and heavy industry simply because they were heavily unionised. She moved the ecconomic employment of the country to low paid, unskilled, service sectors. This was nothing to do with good ecconomics, or good government but everything to do with what was goog for the Conservative party. This is mirrored now by Coco Carmeron’s concerted attack on the public sector which is the last bastion of large union membership. Although there are things wrong with the Labour party, working people will always be better off under a Labour government.

    Posted by Robert Morgan on Apr 9, 2012 at 8:43 AM
  • Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account